June 10, 2009

-- things comickal -- fun queer comics of 2008 - the honorably mentioned section

Looking back at notable queer comics published, either in print or on the web, in 2008. The criteria for "queer" is relatively loose, but relates only to content: some sort of relevant appearance by/use of queer characters and themes -- lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgenter, etc. It had to mean something to the story, but it didn't have to be about any given queer aspect. It didn't have to be about coming out, or angsting over being or not being gay, or anything like that. As you'll see, the main characters didn't need to be the ones who were themselves queer. And people didn't have to be uplifting or relentlessly honorable -- some of them are not at all nice.

For this first part, we have the honorable mentions, or, Stuff that didn't make the main final list, but is still worth a look:

Adam and Andy by James Asal:


As the title states, it's about Adam and Andy, long time partners (... Who may have last names, but I don't have the slightest idea what they are.) They have a house in the suburbs (...I think), and seem to be living the gay American Dream. We see them at work, at home, at play, their friends and neighbors. We see how they've been changing -- one of the running jokes is about how they're no longer the hardbodies they used to be, despite the workout equipment in the basement. It's a sweet, gentle story.

Structurally, more or less a weekly gag strip. Asal's been expanding the strip in different directions over the past year, so the story has been flexing and changing quite a lot. Updated weekly, the continuing storylines move veeeerrrry sloooooowly. It's fun and it's a good read, it just takes a while to get where it's going. It's not terribly difficult to keep track, in part because Asal has relatively few characters and keeps the focus on an individual storyline until it's run its course. (That said, long-running storylines per se are a fairly new thing to this particular strip.)

The Alcoholic (Jonathan Ames/Dean Haspiel; DC/Vertigo)

In which we learn about the life and times of Jonathan A, who may or may not be Ames. It's basically the story of A's life in alcoholic fits and starts. We start in 2001, where A comes out of an alcohol blackout in a car with a much older woman, with whom he may or may not have had sex. We then flash back to the beginning of his drinking days as a teenager, when he used to hang out with his best friend Sal. They loved each other, in that intense and romantic way that adolescents do, and eventually more or less accidentally have sex with each other. Unfortunately, it seems to throw both of them off balance; Sal reacts by pushing A to the margins of his life, and A reacts by drinking to bury the pain of being pushed away from his closest friend. And somehow ... he just never really stops drinking. He goes into rehab, but that doesn't quite stick. He has some spectacularly disastrous relationships with women -- there was never any particular doubt that he's more or less straight, after a certain amount of understandable early floundering. And eventually -- far too late -- he meets Sal again, under some very changed circumstances. But this isn't a story about that meeting, particularly; that's just one event in a very appallingly eventful life. It's really the story of A and his addiction to alcohol -- and later, other drugs -- and how that wreaks havoc on the rest of his life.

I really love Haspiel's art. It's a bit less angular, I think, than his style for his Billy Dogma stories, and a bit more detailed. There are places where I'm not entirely sure it's a fit for the story as a whole -- frankly, there are several times where it seems more interesting and dynamic than the story it's helping to tell.

As a whole, The Alcoholic is an interesting story of a life gone out of balance. It does leave you wondering if A can ever permanently dig himself out of the morass he's made for himself ... and if A is really Ames, how much of all of that really happened.

Buffy the Vampire Slayer (Various writers and artists; Dark Horse)

I actually thought the storyline in which Buffy winds up sleeping with Satsu was pretty well handled. Buffy tried to avoid her, knowing that Satsu was quietly in love with her and that she couldn't return Satsu's feelings, but then winds up falling into bed with her mostly because she's desperately lonely, and Satsu cares. Given that she got involved with Spike, who should have been staked seasons ago, and with Riley who got himself involved with vampires, a one-night stand with Satsu really barely registers on Buffy's bad romantic/sexual decisions index. And the part where they decide not to tell anyone, followed almost immediately by a parade of people with urgent business coming into Buffy's bedroom, was well-done comedy. The part where Willow grilled Satsu on Buffy's bedroom skills, not so much. Satsu eventually -- eventually -- winds up coming out of the relationship just fine, once she accepts that she and Buffy Will Never Be.

In more fun tales of lesbians elsewhere, we discover that we haven't seen Kennedy because Willow's been trying to keep her out of the way, someplace where she won't get captured or killed ... well, on the one hand, given Willow's romantic history, it's understandable. On the other, given that Kennedy's a slayer who was in on the last apocalypse, it's kind of unbelievable, as well, both that Willow would do that, and that Kennedy would tolerate it as long as she does. So something good, something not so good, but as a whole, still noteworthy.

Kyle's Bed and Breakfast by Greg Fox:

basically a soap opera, telling us of the lives of the many people who flow in and out of Kyle's Bed and Breakfast. I really like this strip. It has a fairly diverse cast, and the artwork is generally very good -- though the art can get a bit strange. (Seriously, this strip just looks odd. Breyer's not-really-sleeping position looks weirdly stiff -- though I think that may be deliberate -- and in the final frame, his head looks like it's about to come right off. I'd also note that the entire strip is about an argument that we never saw, which is awkward storytelling for characters you don't see that often.)

The comic updates once every two weeks, more or less, and it's got a cast far too large for its update frequency. (Understand that I am not saying, "Oh, woe is we! Why doesn't he do that five days a week? Then we could have all the comic goodness we want!" Seriously, the guy's got a life, and this don't pay the bills. I get that, really.) The cast page doesn't include most of the characters and the older archives were taken offline to put into the book, so you have no real way of figuring out who people are in context, no way to quickly remember, "Oh, yeah, that's how the guy in the wheelchair came into the story." Especially given that it does take place in a bed and breakfast -- you have both a certain amount of regular cast, but also a reasonably high rate of turnover, because that's what a B&B does -- it can be very difficult to figure out who's connected to who, who's permanent and who's a guest, what the heck is going on, and who is that guy in the green sweater on the far right, anyway?

Punch an' Pie by Aeire and Chris Daily:

I wanted to include this one on the main list, so, so much. I really like this series, primarily about a young woman learning to be on her own and her varied and sundry friends and their lives. But ... but there really wasn't any technically appropriate content in 2008. In 2007, yes. That year, Angela and Heather had a relationship that eventually came a-cropper over Angela's persistent and unwarranted jealousy issues. In 2008, however, while neither of them was precisely over the relationship, they didn't really gotten involved with anyone else, either; the storyline focused on friends and jobs and other things. They're just getting on with the rest of their lives. Plus, to the extent that anything seems to be happening, Heather's had a couple of apparent rebound flings with Aiden, which is, you know, all heterosexual and stuff.

Shortpacked by David Willis:

fun and wacky hijinx of a retail toy store, featuring a gay guy who only figured that out a couple of years ago, the virgin and "my lesbian", and an apparently bisexual asshole. Oh, and Faz. It's fun to read, it's just ... well. One could send the "Mike sleeps with everyone for revenge over uncommitted slights" storyline to GLAAD and watch their heads explode. (Oh, the temptation...) And yet ... it does have its weirdly sweet moments, every now and again. Of course, they never end well...

Sleazy Pizza (Ryan Roman; act-i-vate.com; adult and NSFW due to depictions of sex and nudity)


Originally, I was going to put this on the main list. I really do think it's a facinating, trippy, well-drawn comic. That said, it's hard to get around the author's assertion that it became "chaotic and disjointed" near the end. (I liked it anyway. In part because I just plain like Roman's artwork, but in part because I wanted to see where he was going to take it next, and how it could possibly work.)

Sleazy Pizza tells the story of Nolan and Jon, starcrossed lovers if ever there were any. Though it doesn't seem that way at first. They find each other, they start a relationship ... and then it goes bad, and they break up. Nolan realizes that he's made a horrible mistake and tries to find J.J. again, but all of J.J's friends are hiding him from Nolan. Eventually, Nolan gets someone to tell him where to find J.J. -- at a certain cost to Nolan and the other guy both -- and their relationship begins again. And then it suddenly veers and turns into a sort of sequel to Roman's earlier comic "Kid Zero". ("Kid Zero" has the most fascinatingly grand guignol ending -- and middling and occasional other goriness -- of a superhero comic that I've ever seen. I'd link to the ending, but unfortunately, it's on act-i-vate's livejournal site, and act-i-vate's LJ archive is a mess. This is the last part I can find, with links to all the earlier parts, but I'm not sure it's the actual end, as I remember it. But I digress.)

Seriously, though, some of the places where you can see it kind of heading into odd territory are really interesting and well-done. You even got occational outbreaks of Meat Loaf, sort of. Any road, Roman seems to be reeling the comic back in -- sort of -- with the current volume, and, weirdly, has maintained the fascinatingly trippy tone even though the story is more grounded so far. The current volume seems to be about actions that have consequences, even though you may not have been in full control of your actions at the time. It'll be interesting to see where it goes.


Coming up next: the main list! (Do not even think about asking when "next" is.)

Questions? Comments? Cigars, cigarettes, Cigarillos?

June 03, 2009

-- media and society -- i now pronounce you retailer and retailed

Amazon and Logo Announce New Gay & Lesbian Online Store - Cinematical

A mere six weeks after Amazon incited outrage when it was discovered that a "glitch" had de-listed thousands of books with gay and lesbian content, the massive online retailer has announced a partnership with gay-themed cable network Logo to create a revamped LGBT section in Amazon's Movies & TV store...

I am deeply amused. This makes me suspect that they were likely trying something out with Amazonfail that went very badly indeed. (So all the protesting about the "rogue cataloger in France"? Probably not so much of one, no.) At a guess, there was probably some erroneous programming, yes, and the switch got tripped far too soon -- possibly a test that was meant to be done on a backup copy of the system, and not the main public catalog. That said ... even if they were doing it for the Logo store and video content, the metadata on the items was, and remains, far too broad. But I digress.

On the whole, it looks like it's just a subsection of the Amazon catalog -- albeit a strangely invisible one. If you know the front page, you can go straight to it. If you do a search within the main Amazon catalog for a Logo-branded item -- Noah's Arc, for example -- it appears in the catalog without any mention of the Logo store. You'd think that anything that appeared in the Logo store would have something attached to the record that said, "Hey, we've got an entire store of stuff Just For You! Anything that has ever been anywhere in the vague vicinity of Logo! All together in one place! Really! Have a look!" You know, something like that. Amazon is not, after all, known to be terribly subtle about such things, and normally it works for them just fine.

As long as the stuff isn't being separated out of the main catalog, I suppose there's nothing bad about this. Given the implementation, it's hard to see how it benefits anyone besides Logo -- it gives them a way of directing deep links off of their site, and possibly gets them out of the vendor business, if that's what they want. Eh. We'll see how it goes.

May 07, 2009

-- television -- southland

So I've been watching the new police procedural show on NBC, Southland, since it debuted about a month ago. And mostly, I like the show. It's an interesting balance between showing the mundane aspects of police work, and the more interesting investigations. To the extent that we've seen them, I like the various characters. I like the interplay between rookie cop Sherman and the gruff older (and gay, though it's been very very understated) cop Cooper. Regina King's detective Lydia Adams is kind of awesome. The characters mostly seem like real people, and not types or charicatures. But something about it has been bothering me, but it wasn't until this week that I understood what it was. And it's just this: the show takes place in the modern day, but they're showing us the Los Angeles Police Department of 1980.

The Los Angeles they're showing us is overwhelmingly black and Latino, with occasional moments of relatively well off and working class whites. (NB: According to the LA Almanac, Los Angeles is roughly 30% white, 9% black, 13% Asian, 46% Hispanic, and the rest assorted other.) The LAPD they're showing us is overwhelmingly white. (According to Wikipedia, which got the stats from the US Department of Justice, "the LAPD was 82% male in 2000. 46% of the department was white, 33% of the department was Hispanic/Latino, 14% was African American, and 7% was Asian.") As far as we can tell, Southland seems to contain several white cops, one Latino, two blacks and two women (with overlap between the last two). Granted, it's only one precinct. And granted, the black woman and Glynn Turman's occasional chief of police are blacks in a position of authority. And granted, television has only just so much obligation to have its fictions resemble reality even a little.

It seems to be a thing that happens with police procedurals set in Los Angeles. It was present, though not quite to the same degree, with FX's The Shield. The Shield had much more in the way of both black and Hispanic police around, and just as important, recurring black and Hispanic other characters who had, like, lines. And, to be sure, it's not remotely fair to be judging Southland on its recurring characters; after all, it's only been on a few weeks, and we've barely started to get a handle on all the regular characters. (If I were to give a pure critique, I'd say that the show was perhaps a mite overpopulated; it's difficult to even remember who characters are week to week, and it's got to accommodate so many of them each episode that it can seem a bit cluttered. That said, that aspect seems fairly realistic. At any given time, you're going to have a lot of police in any given precinct, out on the streets, etc. It just makes for busy drama.)

Southland's casting is only really problematic when you have episodes like the one from May 7, where one of the cops gets his gun stolen by some gang members after a traffic accident. In order to find the gun without having to fill out an incident report, the cops roust out something called a "misdemeanor bust", where they basically arrest everyone they can see for any reason whatsoever. In other words, what we see is a bunch of white cops rousting and harrassing, with no real cause, a bunch of blacks and Latinos. In the real world, that would have gotten them, at the least, a blizzard of entirely justified police harrassment complaints and lawsuits, and quite possibly an out-and-out riot. The media would have been covering it much more than they were, and heads would have had to been seen to have rolled.

Quite honestly, I don't think the producers and writers ever thought about how this looks, in that sense. I'm not saying that anyone was at all, to any degree, racist.They got the best actors they could find for the roles they had in mind. Which ... fine, OK, I get that, really I do. But at some level, it seems like they should have thought about how their televised Los Angeles and LAPD would look against the real Los Angeles and LAPD. And beyond that, they should have thought about how casting the way they did would make their LAPD look against their Los Angeles. And I really don't think they did.

I still like the show. I still think it's worth watching, and that it's enjoyable, overall. But it is deeply and sincerely problematic, here and there.

March 16, 2009

-- television -- beyond scifi

Sci Fi Channel Has a New Name - Now, It's Syfy - NYTimes.com

By STUART ELLIOTT

FOR years, television viewers, journalists who write about TV and services that compile listings have wondered how to refer to a certain cable network: Sci Fi Channel? Sci-Fi Channel? SciFi Channel? SCI FI Channel?

Soon, to paraphrase Rod Serling — whose vintage series, "The Twilight Zone," is a mainstay of the Sci Fi Channel — executives will submit for public approval another name, not only of sight and sound but of mind, meant to signal a channel whose boundaries are that of imagination. That's the signpost up ahead — your next stop, Syfy.

Plans call for Sci Fi and its companion Web site (scifi.com) to morph into the oddly spelled Syfy — pronounced the same as "Sci Fi" — on July 7. The new name will be accompanied by the slogan "Imagine Greater," which replaces a logo featuring a stylized version of Saturn.

A channel called Syfy will, presumably, not be confused with SyFi Global, an information technology company; S.Y.F.I., the Summer Youth Forestry Institute; or Syfo seltzer, sold by Universal Beverages.

The tweaking of the Sci Fi name, introduced in 1992, is part of a rebranding campaign that seeks to distinguish the channel and its programming from cable competitors — 75 of which are also measured by the Nielsen ratings service.

The Syfy name is to be introduced on Monday to advertisers and agencies by executives of Sci Fi, part of the NBC Universal Cable Entertainment division of NBC Universal, a unit of General Electric.

The name will be revealed at an upfront presentation, when networks try to win commitments by advertisers to blocks of commercial time before the start of the next TV season. Cable channels will spend this month and next making upfront presentations; the broadcast networks will follow in April and May.

One big advantage of the name change, the executives say, is that Sci Fi is vague — so generic, in fact, that it could not be trademarked. Syfy, with its unusual spelling, can be, which is also why diapers are called Luvs, an online video Web site is called Joost and a toothpaste is called Gleem. "We couldn't own Sci Fi; it's a genre," said Bonnie Hammer, the former president of Sci Fi who became the president of NBC Universal Cable Entertainment and Universal Cable Productions. "But we can own Syfy."

Another benefit of the new name is that it is not "throwing the baby away with the bath water," she added, because it is similar enough to the Sci Fi brand to convey continuity to "the fan-boys and -girls who love the genre." [...]

Actually, I'm pretty sure that this will convey to "the fan-boys and -girls who love the genre" the opportunity to relentlessly mock the corporate overlords at NBC Universal. Because, seriously, Syfy? Seriously? Seriously?

NBC Universal has been searching ceaselessly for a way to rebrand SciFi almost since they bought it. The previous name change floated was "BeyondTV". This ran into, most likely, two issues: (1) BeyondTV was probably no more copyrightable than SciFi, and (2) the trademark was already owned by another company, who doesn't seem to have been interested in surrendering it. (By contrast, the former SyFy Portal site has now become Airlock Alpha, suggesting that they were not so loath to surrender a relentlessly silly phonetic name -- and my guess, and it's only a guess, is that they settled on that name because if they tried scifiportal.com as an address, the corporate SciFi leaned over and said "Ahem. We don't think so" (which is also why most people gave them a pass for having such a silly name) -- for hopefully lavish amounts of cash. (More likely, NBC Universal informed SyFy Portal of the planned change, and pointed out that once they'd done it, SyFy Portal would then be in trademark violation, and even though NBC Universal would eventually lose any such suit -- SyFy Portal predates the change, and has for quite some time -- it would cost them time and money they surely didn't have, so they might as well just surrender Dorothy now and get it over with.) In any event, it's clear that SciFi's corporate overlords ardently desired a way to rebrand and trademark the channel for ... well, that's just it. What does having a trademark in a television channel get you, exactly? The right to run around telling the kids to get off your intellectual property lawn? What?

With this name change, NBC Universal manages to inflict upon itself the worst of all possible worlds. First, given that it's phonetically the same as the old moniker, most people really won't notice the difference, even though the Saturn logo is also going away. This also means that the "limiting" features of the name will remain -- just because you're spelling it differently doesn't mean that people will think of SciFi any differently, especially when the content isn't any different. Second, people will be mocking them up and down the town. Third, for a channel interested in allegedly showing out-there, thought-provoking television (and, of course, wrestling), they've shown themselves to be signally out of touch. Mind, I don't think this is a debacle along the lines of the Tropicana package redesign, which is also mentioned in the article. Not because it's not just as big a change; I just don't think people are going to care that much.

Mind, I could be wrong. After all, how many consumers would want to be associated with such a channel that could make as brain-damaged a change as this?

Copyright © 1999 - June 2009 Iain Jackson, after-words.org