« oxymoron vs moron | Main | all our exes die in texas ... even if they're innocent »

letters of national security and the fbi

May 3, 2006

FBI Sought Data on Thousands in '05 By Dan Eggen Washington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, May 2, 2006; A04

The FBI sought personal information on thousands of Americans last year from banks, Internet service providers and other companies without having to seek approval from a court, according to new data released by the Justice Department. In a report to the top leaders of both parties in the House, the department disclosed that the FBI had issued more than 9,200 "national security letters," or NSLs, seeking detailed information about more than 3,500 U.S. citizens or legal residents in 2005. The report, released late Friday, represents the first official count of NSL use. It was required under legislation that extended the USA Patriot Act anti-terrorism law.

The count does not include other such letters that are issued by the FBI to obtain more limited subscriber information from companies, such as a person's name, address or other identifying data, according to the report. Sources have said that would include thousands of additional letters and may be the largest category of NSLs issued. The Washington Post reported in November that the FBI now issues more than 30,000 NSLs each year, including subscriber requests.

The Justice Department report also outlined a continued increase in the use of secret warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA. The secret court that oversees the law approved a record 2,072 orders for clandestine searches or surveillance in 2005 -- an 18 percent increase from the year before.

The new statistics provide the latest measure of the government's rapidly expanding anti-terrorism activities, which include a wide range of secret warrants and powers aimed at monitoring suspicious behavior and preventing attacks. Many of the tactics have come under criticism from civil liberties groups as intrusive and lacking in proper oversight. National security letters, for example, are a form of administrative subpoena that can be issued by scores of FBI managers around the country.

"This tells us why they didn't want to tell us in the past how many of these they were actually using," said Caroline Fredrickson, Washington legislative director for the American Civil Liberties Union. "The idea that this kind of power resides in the hands of so many people at the FBI with no court oversight is very troubling."

The government previously has declined to reveal how many NSLs have been issued by the FBI and criticized the Post report as inaccurate. A Justice Department official said yesterday that the department would not comment on how many more NSLs have been issued for subscriber data only....

You know ... I get that this is a country with something like 300 million people in it. The most populous of the Western nations and all that.

And still ... just how many terrorists can there possibly be in this country? If there were really that many people trying to do things, stuff would be blowing up real good every single day! There really can't be any legitimate cause for so many requests for information under the PATRIOT "Constitutional Evisceration" Act.

I get that it's the FBI's job to be paranoid. That's what law enforcement does. But it's also Congress' and the executive's job to rein that in. To be sure, we have no reason to expect that the current executive would seek any restraints on an executive agency; after all, the administration is on record as believing that such constitutional restraints don't apply to them. But still, we have the right to expect better of Congress than this. At the least, we have the right to expect Congress to ask questions. To demand information. To demand that the administration treat them as the co-equal branch of government that they are. To serve the people they represent by demanding answers, and blocking the administration from abusing the people of this country.

But they haven't.

And they won't.

Posted by iain at May 03, 2006 11:17 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recent posts

moral coherence, or, why defense of gays matters

aclu vs cipa

peace of mind

media relations: bondage ... bloody bondage

election night 2006: fun fun fun for everyone!

all our exes die -- in kentucky

nj supreme court says ... something

the bradley effect

obama for president? redux

death of habeas corpus

hastert and full disclosure

cook county: corruption free! We promise! Really!

obama for president?

banned books display banned because it contained banned books

iraq vs the media

he wants your sex

obit: tyrone garner

a blind eye to genocide

the fourteen thousand

a reason why

graduation day

powell vs the president

media relations: government encourages drug use, news at 10

darfur, again

ohio loses its collective legal mind