« Whatcom County Rural Library District vs United States | Main | bush administration: we like torture! (even if we can't actually do it ourselves) »

part of patriot act ruled unconstitutional

September 29, 2004

My, my. Will wonders never cease.

Government Computer News (GCN) daily news -- federal, state and local government technology; Court curbs Justice's probes of ISPs
By Wilson P. Dizard III
GCN Staff
Sept 29, 2004

A federal district court judge today struck down a provision of the USA Patriot Act that allows the FBI to issue secret administrative subpoenas to Internet service providers and others without judicial review.

Judge Victor Marrero of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled in the case of John Doe et al v. John Ashcroft et al that the government does not have the authority to cloak the national security letters it issues to seek electronic information in perpetual secrecy without judicial review.

Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo said, "We are reviewing the ruling." The American Civil Liberties Union, which represented the anonymous Doe, cited the decision as "a stunning victory against John Ashcroft's Justice Department."

Marrero stayed the execution of his order barring the FBI from issuing national security letters for 90 days or until the government appeals.


ACLU vs Ashcroft (Actual Ruling: very slow loading and quite large 122-page PDF file at the ACLU web site)

It will be fascinating to see what comes of this. Ashcroft's Star Chamber will appeal, of course; they've go no reason not to, and every reason to try to get this ruling off the books. One can but hope that federal courts up the line will agree that this is an unconstitutional restraint and continue to strike that part of the law.

Of course, with Congress poised to pass PATRIOT Act: The Sequel, it's likely that the various plaintiffs in PATRIOT Act cases everywhere will have to go through everything all over again.

One wonders what Congress and Ashcroft are so afraid of that they feel that they need to destroy the Constitution they are charged to uphold.

Posted by iain at September 29, 2004 05:22 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recent posts

bush administration: we like torture! (even if we can't actually do it ourselves)

part of patriot act ruled unconstitutional

Whatcom County Rural Library District vs United States

rnc's fear factor

Obama opposes gay marriage

keyes vs the polls

safety violations in porn

gary habitat for humanity home burned

and as the illinois senate race sails comfortably over the moon...

subsidized, segregated voucher housing

overtime

jesus for keyes?

sanity strikes, news at eleven

so who gets to be noah?

august in sudan

is the truth out there?

keyes and his sterling political style

log cabin republicans: stop the insanity!

the vanishing protestant majority

connections, contradictions, and coordination

aids in the usa: prison

what's in a name?

aids in the usa: women living with aids

aids in the usa: north carolina

episcopal split