home page grim amusements - weblog media relations - media commentary scriptorium - essays dear mr postmanners - humor links

 


 
« Black like me -- but not too black | Main | uncle walter returns! at age 86 »

blair's problems

June 17, 2003

The Scotsman - Top Stories - Speaker rebukes Blair: THE Prime Minister has been ordered to appear before MPs to explain the impact of the constitutional changes created by last week's botched Cabinet reshuffle. Amid further fall-out from the disastrous shake-up, Tony Blair was told by Michael Martin, the Speaker, to make a statement to the Commons tomorrow, outlining why he decided to scrap the role of the Lord Chancellor after 1,400 years.

Yes, I should think he might be asked to explain himself, in that case. As part of that government "reshuffle", among other proposals, Blair proposes to create a British supreme court, which would absorb the function of the Law Lords as the court of last resort in Britain.

If I understand what I've been reading, to make such changes actually is within his purview as prime minister, very technically speaking (or to propose that the Commons and Lords do so, in some cases -- although it's rather difficult to imagine that the Lords would go along with the abolition of the Law Lords); it's simply that prime ministers never EVER do such things. (Well, clearly, since the office of lord chancellor and the Law Lords are so very old.) Apparently this is part of his attempt to reform Britain's public sector. It would seem to have started rather badly. (Although, watching what is happening in the US, he does seem to be entirely correct about the Right wanting "to demolish the very ethos on which [public services] are built." One wonders if his pal George and the Republicans have been serving as a peculiar sort of object lesson.)

Blair has also been accused of not consulting the queen about abolishing a 1,400 year old office. Mind, I'm not entirely sure why it matters whether he did or not -- her assent doesn't seem to be required for very much. Nonetheless, it would seem spectacularly politically unwise.

If he wanted to distract from what's turning into a very problematic inquiry over Iraq, I suppose he's succeeded, up to a point. Mind, adding one scandal on top of another would not normally be a sensible way to proceed, and I should think that many more such successes will see him out of office rather quickly.

Posted by iain at June 17, 2003 12:55 PM

 

Comments
Post a comment


Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:






 

 

 

 

 

Recent posts

uncle walter returns! at age 86

blair's problems

Black like me -- but not too black

attacking mecca?

justice in texas

spike spikes spike

philadelphia freedom ... or, you know, maybe not

the house republicans vs ... the republican president?

spike lee vs spike tv

missing weapons and their fallout

flag burning

it's always martha, martha, martha!

nullsoft's null software

bravo: the cable channel that makes fun of gay men so you don't have to!

europe's constitution

bulls and china shops

revenge for justice

glbtq

tulia under review

iraq's payment

ringing in the ... pot?

enemies to the right of him...

speak softly ....

fast track to new iraq?

soulsville usa