You know, I can understand why they want to define these things; given the current legal system, it only makes a certain amount of sense. But ... "defining evil?" How do you manage this? "Well, he had this bit of that aggravating factor and this bit of that one, but none of the others, so ... he's only 26% evil. Sorry, but you need to be at least 51% evil to get the death penalty. he's just not depraved enough."
12/19/2001: vive la france
12/19/2001: princess, redux
12/19/2001: yemen and rumsfeld
12/18/2001: you're NOT in the army now
12/18/2001: interesting donation
12/18/2001: shame on winn dixie, indeed
12/18/2001: saudi princess
12/17/2001: new resolve
12/17/2001: a victim of the attack ... yeah, right
12/17/2001: polluters ho!