April 23, 2008

researching exercise

Well. How ... interesting. AND NOT SAFE FOR WORK (No naughty pictures, but the TITLE attribute might give a bit of pause)

New sex services hold out a healthy helping hand to halt those mean metabolic blues - Mainichi Daily News

In 2005, Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare pronounced that roughly one middle-aged person in two was at risk for so-called "metabolic syndrome" -- caused by smoking, drinking, eating and other excesses combined with a sedentary lifestyle -- that raised the likelihood of cardiovascular disease, diabetes and strokes. The ministry's policy now obliges people between the ages of 40 to 74 to take medical examinations to check for excessive internal fat, high blood pressure and high blood-sugar levels, and to receive health advisories when warranted. [...] The middle-aged spread, reports Asahi Geino (4/24), has given rise to a completely new type of sex business: the "Datsu-metabo fuuzoku" -- sex shops with services designed to help pudgy, middle-aged men bang their way back to health and enjoy themselves in the bargain.

"If she can get my fatty liver back in shape, she'll deserve a Nobel Prize," Asahi Geino's reporter remarks, tongue in cheek....

There then follows a description of a "research investigation" that would produce mild hysteria in any American magazine editorial staff this side of, say, Hustler. (The odd thing about the writing, frankly, is that it reads very much as if the reporter were watching the researcher do his ... er, research.) And honestly, it doesn't seem terribly ... well, aerobic, for lack of a better word. Even if he'd managed to complete the entire hour.

Apart from the societal differences that would allow such a place to even exist openly -- after all, we do have Nevada, and Canada has ... well, Canada, so such a place is at least possible in a few restricted locations -- it's interesting that the services performed don't seem noteworthy, in and of themselves. If you could even get a US weekly to publish an article like this, the tone would certainly be quite a bit more scandalized -- especially if the reporter himself were doing the writing after experiencing said "research". It does, after all, sound as though said "research" implements were neither discussed beforehand nor expected before being used, and I would think your average American male would be just a tad incensed at the very idea. And honestly, I'd have to see actual research -- as opposed to this research -- on the aerobic and health benefits of said research tools used in quite that way before I'd believe in quite those particular health benefits. Enjoyable, perhaps; aerobic exercise with improved cardiovascular health and blood pressure, maybe not so much. And even then ... frankly, when it comes to exercise for the sake of exercise, I think I'd prefer fewer distractions.

Interestingly enough, the price doesn't actually seem all that bad, for the services offered. 8,000 Yen translates to roughly $78 per hour, more or less; assume that it rounds up to $100 with a tip, if that's allowed. A personal trainer offering the normal help with exercises and equipment is going to cost you $60-100 per hour in the US, if Wikipedia is correct, so it's entirely in line with that sort of cost, if that costs the same in Japan. That said, one can but agree with the reporter: most people really couldn't afford a full four-hour session. Unless you're Eliot Spitzer, of course. And if he'd embarked on a $400 per session exercise program, as opposed to a $15,000 per session one, he might never have been caught.

April 14, 2008

the government vs the poor

And people wonder why the poor and minorities so frequently don't trust government.

Sludge tested as lead protection in poor areas - The Boston Globe

Scientists using federal grants spread fertilizer made from human and industrial wastes on yards in poor, black neighborhoods to test whether it might protect children from lead poisoning in the soil. Families were assured the sludge was safe and were never told about any potential risks. Nine low-income families in Baltimore row houses agreed to let researchers till the sewage sludge into their yards and plant new grass. In exchange, they were given food coupons as well as the free lawns as part of a study published in 2005 and funded by the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

The Associated Press reviewed grant documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act and interviewed researchers. No one involved with the $446,231 grant for the two-year study would identify the participants, citing privacy concerns. There is no evidence there was any medical follow-up.

Comparable research was conducted by the Agriculture Department and Environmental Protection Agency in a similarly poor, black neighborhood in East St. Louis, Ill. Residents there also were not told of the potential risks.

The researchers said the sludge could help protect the children from brain or nerve damage from lead, a highly toxic element once widely used in gasoline and paint. Other studies have shown brain damage among children, often in poor neighborhoods, who ate lead-based paint that had flaked off their homes. The idea that sludge - the leftover semisolid wastes filtered from water pollution at 16,500 treatment plants - can be turned into something harmless, even if swallowed, has been a tenet of federal policy for three decades.

[...] The Baltimore study concluded that phosphate and iron in sludge can increase the ability of soil to trap more harmful metals including lead, cadmium, and zinc, causing the combination to pass safely through a child's body if eaten. The results were published in Science of the Total Environment, a research journal, in 2005. However, there has been a paucity of research into the possible harmful effects of heavy metals, pharmaceuticals, other chemicals, and disease-causing microorganisms often found in sludge....

So, more or less, the people weren't told about the risks because the government hasn't got the slightest idea what those risks might actually be. And, of course, if people were properly informed of the risks beforehand -- or that the researchers didn't know what the risks were -- they might have backed out of the study, because people don't usually voluntarily expose their children to unknown risks.

Thing is, this is going to be presented as a failure of government issue, and honestly, it doesn't necessarily seem to be that. Not simply, anyway. It's a near-criminal failure of oversight -- someone, somewhere, should have been looking at the consent forms and saying, "Hey, where's the part where you tell people about the risks of doing this? Where's the information on disease incidence resulting from the sludge chemicals themselves?" It does seem to be a rather impressive failure of ethics among the researchers, and the Agriculture Department, Environmental Protection Agency, and Housing and Human Services do not seem to have covered themselves in glory.

April 03, 2008

a capful of bleach

Sex ed bill proposes more than abstinence-only - Northwest Florida Daily News

The Associated Press
Tuesday April 1st, 2008

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — Some Florida teens believe drinking Mountain Dew or smoking marijuana will prevent pregnancy and that swallowing a capful of bleach will prevent HIV/AIDS. One reason those dangerous myths have spread is the state's reliance on abstinence-only sex education, say advocates of a bill to require a more comprehensive approach in Florida's schools....

A capful of bleach. Yes. Indeed. I suppose it could prevent HIV, what with possibly preventing further living at all.

OK, yes, a capful of bleach in and of itself probably won't immediately kill you. But it could easily do major damage to your esophagus and stomach, and wouldn't do a damn thing to prevent HIV.

...The bill's chances, though, remain slim with the annual 60-day legislative session nearly half over. The bill would have to clear three more committees before getting a Senate floor vote. The House version has yet to get a committee hearing.

"Young people are getting too little information too late,'' said Jenna Cawley, director of education for Planned Parenthood of Greater Orlando. Cawley urged the bill's approval as she told the Senate Education Pre-kindergarten-12th Grade Committee about the Mountain Dew, marijuana and bleach myths.

Opponents, including anti-abortion activists, claimed the bill's requirements would result in more, not fewer teen pregnancies as supporters argue. "The only healthy, 100-percent effective way to prevent disease and pregnancy is abstinence,'' said Alison Lambrechts, a field coordinator for Project Reality, which provides sexual, alcohol and drug abstinence materials for schools.

The bill's sponsor, Sen. Ted Deutch, D-Boca Raton, said Florida's current approach isn't working because the state has the sixth-highest teen pregnancy rate nationally...

I marvel that the sincerely misnamed Project Reality seems to prefer people doing epic damage to themselves over providing accurate information. And I marvel that the Florida legislature, despite knowing about these issues, seems likely to let the situation continue.

I do wonder, regardless of who wins the upcoming presidential election, if the winners will have either the political will or desire to correct this situation at the federal level, by removing all the "abstinence-only" requirements and preferences for states and organizations to receive federal funding. I truly can't see McCain thinking that he should touch that; he already has enough problems with conservatives thinking he's Not A True Believer. I can see both Obama and Clinton having the will, but not having the support and not feeling that it's worth spending the political capital, feeling that it will only be overturned by the craven cowards of Congress and that it would only energize conservatives for the midterms to try to shove Congress more to the right.

I marvel at the state of education generally in this country. With more and more that people seem to need to know just to function, to get everything they need, to have a good life, education seems to march relentlessly ever backward.

February 27, 2008

all about nader, visually speaking

Just because.

Really, those just about cover it.

...Well, maybe except for that last one. I mean, I can't imagine, in this climate, that voting for Nader would feel all that good. Except for maybe the spectacular momentary feeling of self-righteousness, but since when do you get that from masturbation?

February 13, 2008

the science of sex

Apparently, February 11 was the Sex issue for the LA Times, or something like that.

Regarding the study below: All's I can say is that I'm impressed by the fact that they seem to actually have a fair number of fearless volunteers. I would think that volunteers for this type of study are incredibly difficult to find, even with as many people as we have in this country.

Los Angeles Times: Science of the orgasm
By Regina Nuzzo
Special to The Times
February 11, 2008

AS they seek to document and demystify one of life's great thrills, scientists have run across some real head-scratchers.

How, for example, can they explain the fact that some men and women who are paralyzed and numb below the waist are able to have orgasms? How to explain the "orgasmic auras" that can descend at the onset of epileptic seizures -- sensations so pleasurable they prompt some patients to refuse antiseizure medication? And how on Earth to explain the case of the amputee who felt his orgasms centered in that missing foot?

No one -- no sexologist, no neuroscientist -- really knows. For a subject with so many armchair experts, the human orgasm is remarkably mysterious.

But today, a few scientists are making real progress -- in part because they're changing their focus. To uncover the orgasm's secrets, researchers are looking beyond the clitoris, vagina, penis and prostate, to the place behind the scenes where the true magic happens. They're examining the central nervous system: the network of electrical impulses that zip to and fro through the brain and spinal cord.

In an orgasm orchestra, the genitalia may be the instruments, but the central nervous system is the conductor.

Armed with new lab tools and fearless volunteers, scientists are getting first-ever glimpses of how the brain lights up (and, in places, shuts down) when the orgasmic fireworks go off. They're tracing nerves and finding new pathways for pleasure that help explain how people with shattered spinal cords can defy sexual expectations....


Benefits 'O'-verall"
By Regina Nuzzo, Special to The Times
February 11, 2008

Sure, orgasms can put a bounce in one's step, but some studies hint they might also be good for one's health.

* Heart: Lots of studies have looked at whether DHEA, a hormone released into the bloodstream during arousal and orgasm, helps keeps arteries clear and hearts strong. A 2001 study of 1,700 middle-age Massachusetts men found that those with the lowest levels of DHEA were about 60% more likely to develop heart disease than those with the highest. Orgasms aren't the only way to get this hormone, though; your body produces some even without sexual stimulation.

* Breast: Oxytocin -- a hormone released during sexual arousal, orgasm and breast-feeding -- has been linked to reduced risk of breast cancer. And not just for women: A small, 2000 study of 23 Greek men found that those with breast cancer tended to have a history of fewer orgasms than did healthy men in the control group. One 1995 study speculated that the hormone helps flush out carcinogens from breast fluid.

* Prostate: Two large studies, reported in 2003 and 2004, found that middle-aged men who had (or at least remember having) at least four orgasms a week throughout their 20s, 30s and 40s had a reduced risk of prostate cancer by as much as one-third. Some researchers speculate that ejaculations may clear the prostate of carcinogens....

What I'd like to know about the above studies, frankly, is how many of them measure the benefits of orgasm versus which ones measure the benefits of intercourse. I don't remember where I saw it, but I have a vague memory that the oxytocin study is specific to intercourse, that masturbation doesn't produce quite the same benefits, although it did produce some. That could be an entirely false memory, though.

Copyright © 1999 - April 2008 Iain Jackson, after-words.org

? chicago blogs ?

Listed on BlogShares

 


Valid CSS!